However, the martial arts considered in the article – Judo, Karate and Aikido, bear within them the tradition and culture of their place of origin. They are a favored recreation, as well as a profession to millions of practitioners. Japanese martial arts have gained immense popularity and have spread all over the world. Therefore, a jiu-jitsu practitioner is practically unable to master the techniques completely, considering the stages of training methods, while for the practitioner of judo all of those stages remain available. On the other hand, the techniques of judo can be performed with full power and with full resistance of the adversary. Consequently, the practitioner of jiu-jitsu is unable to perform the technique to the very end, which, in reality (physical conflict), he/she would certainly do. They are trained with high precaution, usually “until the brink of pain”. Since the techniques of jiu-jitsu are extremely unsafe, it is basically impossible to master them completely. the possibilities that it provides for the improvement of technique, the advantages of that training method are considered comparing to the methods of the technique improvement in jiu-jitsu. Examining the nature of judo randori, i.e. By comparing two methods of technique training, those of judo and jiu-jitsu, through two selected techniques, this paper analyses the limitations in the training of a self-defense practitioner.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |